| Title |
HIV-1 adaptation to NK-cell-mediated immune pressure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature10237 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Galit Alter, David Heckerman, Arne Schneidewind, Lena Fadda, Carl M. Kadie, Jonathan M. Carlson, Cesar Oniangue-Ndza, Maureen Martin, Bin Li, Salim I. Khakoo, Mary Carrington, Todd M. Allen, Marcus Altfeld |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 280 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 71 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 69 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 51 | 17% |
| Unknown | 36 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 118 | 40% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 50 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,904,610
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#40,516
of 91,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,014
of 120,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#474
of 889 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 889 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.