| Title |
Correlation between nanosecond X-ray flashes and stick–slip friction in peeling tape
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature07378 |
| Authors |
Carlos G. Camara, Juan V. Escobar, Jonathan R. Hird, Seth J. Putterman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 11 | 15% |
| United States | 5 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 46 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 59 | 79% |
| Scientists | 15 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 534 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 4% |
| Germany | 14 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 466 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 142 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 122 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 54 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 49 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 6% |
| Other | 81 | 15% |
| Unknown | 52 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 176 | 33% |
| Chemistry | 88 | 16% |
| Engineering | 73 | 14% |
| Materials Science | 47 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 6% |
| Other | 45 | 8% |
| Unknown | 73 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 173. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#237,616
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#13,637
of 98,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#463
of 102,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#15
of 556 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 556 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.