| Title |
Fruit and vegetables and cancer risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Cancer, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606032 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T J Key |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 5% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 5% |
| Central African Republic | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 24% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 489 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 1% |
| Unknown | 464 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 92 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 85 | 17% |
| Researcher | 58 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 9% |
| Other | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 90 | 18% |
| Unknown | 90 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 122 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 92 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 17 | 3% |
| Other | 71 | 15% |
| Unknown | 113 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 132. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#321,081
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#86
of 11,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,235
of 192,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#2
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.