| Title |
Open-access more harm than good in developing world
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, May 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1038/453450c |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raghavendra Gadagkar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 3 | 23% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Argentina | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 62% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 22% |
| Librarian | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 30% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 11% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2023.
All research outputs
#917,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#30,671
of 97,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,879
of 96,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#66
of 642 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 642 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.