| Title |
Widespread potential loss of streamflow into underlying aquifers across the USA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-021-03311-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Scott Jasechko, Hansjörg Seybold, Debra Perrone, Ying Fan, James W. Kirchner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 15% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Japan | 3 | 5% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Malta | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 68% |
| Scientists | 12 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 134 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 22% |
| Researcher | 29 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 29 | 22% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 20% |
| Engineering | 24 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 41 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 453. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#61,124
of 25,455,127 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#4,832
of 97,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,152
of 467,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#141
of 903 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,455,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 903 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.