| Title |
Complete Khoisan and Bantu genomes from southern Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature08795 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephan C. Schuster, Webb Miller, Aakrosh Ratan, Lynn P. Tomsho, Belinda Giardine, Lindsay R. Kasson, Robert S. Harris, Desiree C. Petersen, Fangqing Zhao, Ji Qi, Can Alkan, Jeffrey M. Kidd, Yazhou Sun, Daniela I. Drautz, Pascal Bouffard, Donna M. Muzny, Jeffrey G. Reid, Lynne V. Nazareth, Qingyu Wang, Richard Burhans, Cathy Riemer, Nicola E. Wittekindt, Priya Moorjani, Elizabeth A. Tindall, Charles G. Danko, Wee Siang Teo, Anne M. Buboltz, Zhenhai Zhang, Qianyi Ma, Arno Oosthuysen, Abraham W. Steenkamp, Hermann Oostuisen, Philippus Venter, John Gajewski, Yu Zhang, B. Franklin Pugh, Kateryna D. Makova, Anton Nekrutenko, Elaine R. Mardis, Nick Patterson, Tom H. Pringle, Francesca Chiaromonte, James C. Mullikin, Evan E. Eichler, Ross C. Hardison, Richard A. Gibbs, Timothy T. Harkins, Vanessa M. Hayes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 132 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 23 | 17% |
| France | 9 | 7% |
| Spain | 7 | 5% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Namibia | 1 | <1% |
| Myanmar | 1 | <1% |
| Mauritius | 1 | <1% |
| Andorra | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 76 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 122 | 92% |
| Scientists | 6 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 765 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 2% |
| Brazil | 10 | 1% |
| South Africa | 10 | 1% |
| Germany | 9 | 1% |
| Spain | 7 | <1% |
| Belgium | 5 | <1% |
| Japan | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 26 | 3% |
| Unknown | 653 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 192 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 152 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 72 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 60 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 49 | 6% |
| Other | 174 | 23% |
| Unknown | 66 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 397 | 52% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 95 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 101 | 13% |
| Unknown | 84 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 387. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#80,977
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#5,871
of 98,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209
of 174,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#8
of 519 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 519 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.