↓ Skip to main content

Ancient human genome sequence of an extinct Palaeo-Eskimo

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
46 news outlets
blogs
27 blogs
twitter
18 X users
patent
10 patents
wikipedia
31 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
691 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1200 Mendeley
citeulike
23 CiteULike
connotea
8 Connotea
Title
Ancient human genome sequence of an extinct Palaeo-Eskimo
Published in
Nature, February 2010
DOI 10.1038/nature08835
Pubmed ID
Authors

Morten Rasmussen, Yingrui Li, Stinus Lindgreen, Jakob Skou Pedersen, Anders Albrechtsen, Ida Moltke, Mait Metspalu, Ene Metspalu, Toomas Kivisild, Ramneek Gupta, Marcelo Bertalan, Kasper Nielsen, M. Thomas P. Gilbert, Yong Wang, Maanasa Raghavan, Paula F. Campos, Hanne Munkholm Kamp, Andrew S. Wilson, Andrew Gledhill, Silvana Tridico, Michael Bunce, Eline D. Lorenzen, Jonas Binladen, Xiaosen Guo, Jing Zhao, Xiuqing Zhang, Hao Zhang, Zhuo Li, Minfeng Chen, Ludovic Orlando, Karsten Kristiansen, Mads Bak, Niels Tommerup, Christian Bendixen, Tracey L. Pierre, Bjarne Grønnow, Morten Meldgaard, Claus Andreasen, Sardana A. Fedorova, Ludmila P. Osipova, Thomas F. G. Higham, Christopher Bronk Ramsey, Thomas v. O. Hansen, Finn C. Nielsen, Michael H. Crawford, Søren Brunak, Thomas Sicheritz-Pontén, Richard Villems, Rasmus Nielsen, Anders Krogh, Jun Wang, Eske Willerslev

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 41 3%
United Kingdom 16 1%
Germany 13 1%
France 8 <1%
Brazil 7 <1%
Denmark 6 <1%
Argentina 6 <1%
Chile 5 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
Other 36 3%
Unknown 1057 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 272 23%
Researcher 269 22%
Student > Master 134 11%
Student > Bachelor 130 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 68 6%
Other 206 17%
Unknown 121 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 599 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 203 17%
Social Sciences 47 4%
Arts and Humanities 46 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 3%
Other 127 11%
Unknown 140 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 561. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2024.
All research outputs
#41,800
of 25,147,320 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#3,622
of 96,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82
of 175,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#4
of 519 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,147,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 519 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.