| Title |
Projected increase in continental runoff due to plant responses to increasing carbon dioxide
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, August 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature06045 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard A. Betts, Olivier Boucher, Matthew Collins, Peter M. Cox, Peter D. Falloon, Nicola Gedney, Deborah L. Hemming, Chris Huntingford, Chris D. Jones, David M. H. Sexton, Mark J. Webb |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 29% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 79% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 614 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 2% |
| Brazil | 6 | <1% |
| South Africa | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| China | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 1% |
| Unknown | 568 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 156 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 128 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 8% |
| Professor | 39 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 5% |
| Other | 128 | 21% |
| Unknown | 81 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 171 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 140 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 120 | 20% |
| Engineering | 26 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 36 | 6% |
| Unknown | 113 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2022.
All research outputs
#639,239
of 24,493,651 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#25,495
of 95,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#879
of 69,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#19
of 532 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,493,651 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 95,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 101.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 532 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.