↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of myeloid leukaemia by the cell-fate determinant Musashi

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
2 research highlight platforms

Citations

dimensions_citation
306 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Regulation of myeloid leukaemia by the cell-fate determinant Musashi
Published in
Nature, July 2010
DOI 10.1038/nature09171
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takahiro Ito, Hyog Young Kwon, Bryan Zimdahl, Kendra L. Congdon, Jordan Blum, William E. Lento, Chen Zhao, Anand Lagoo, Gareth Gerrard, Letizia Foroni, John Goldman, Harriet Goh, Soo-Hyun Kim, Dong-Wook Kim, Charles Chuah, Vivian G. Oehler, Jerald P. Radich, Craig T. Jordan, Tannishtha Reya

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 231 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 62 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 17%
Student > Master 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 6%
Other 48 20%
Unknown 44 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 50 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 49 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Physics and Astronomy 3 1%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 49 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,776,186
of 23,767,404 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#39,661
of 92,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,130
of 97,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#209
of 598 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,767,404 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 100.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 598 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.