↓ Skip to main content

Facultative cheater mutants reveal the genetic complexity of cooperation in social amoebae

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Facultative cheater mutants reveal the genetic complexity of cooperation in social amoebae
Published in
Nature, February 2008
DOI 10.1038/nature06558
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorenzo A. Santorelli, Christopher R. L. Thompson, Elizabeth Villegas, Jessica Svetz, Christopher Dinh, Anup Parikh, Richard Sucgang, Adam Kuspa, Joan E. Strassmann, David C. Queller, Gad Shaulsky

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
Germany 4 2%
India 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 222 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 59 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 22%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 27 11%
Professor 16 6%
Other 43 17%
Unknown 19 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 152 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 12%
Physics and Astronomy 6 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 30 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2021.
All research outputs
#793,815
of 18,687,462 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#27,209
of 82,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,998
of 367,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#638
of 907 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,687,462 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 92.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 907 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.