| Title |
Climate change and the global malaria recession
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature09098 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter W. Gething, David L. Smith, Anand P. Patil, Andrew J. Tatem, Robert W. Snow, Simon I. Hay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Argentina | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 700 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 2% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 22 | 3% |
| Unknown | 630 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 141 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 126 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 96 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 82 | 12% |
| Professor | 37 | 5% |
| Other | 120 | 17% |
| Unknown | 98 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 205 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 85 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 47 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 4% |
| Other | 145 | 21% |
| Unknown | 118 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 122. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#342,345
of 25,383,344 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#17,870
of 97,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#888
of 104,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#32
of 604 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,344 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 604 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.