| Title |
Associations between the gut microbiome and fatigue in cancer patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-021-84783-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joud Hajjar, Tito Mendoza, Liangliang Zhang, Siqing Fu, Sarina A. Piha-Paul, David S. Hong, Filip Janku, Daniel D. Karp, Alexej Ballhausen, Jing Gong, Abdulrazzak Zarifa, Christine B. Peterson, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Robert Jenq, Aung Naing |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 102 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 38 | 37% |
| India | 6 | 6% |
| Italy | 5 | 5% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Turkey | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 61 | 60% |
| Scientists | 27 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2022.
All research outputs
#751,287
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#8,158
of 142,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,530
of 453,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#283
of 4,890 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,890 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.