↓ Skip to main content

Heating of Jupiter’s upper atmosphere above the Great Red Spot

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
132 news outlets
blogs
17 blogs
twitter
120 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Heating of Jupiter’s upper atmosphere above the Great Red Spot
Published in
Nature, July 2016
DOI 10.1038/nature18940
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. O’Donoghue, L. Moore, T. S. Stallard, H. Melin

Abstract

The temperatures of giant-planet upper atmospheres at mid- to low latitudes are measured to be hundreds of degrees warmer than simulations based on solar heating alone can explain. Modelling studies that focus on additional sources of heating have been unable to resolve this major discrepancy. Equatorward transport of energy from the hot auroral regions was expected to heat the low latitudes, but models have demonstrated that auroral energy is trapped at high latitudes, a consequence of the strong Coriolis forces on rapidly rotating planets. Wave heating, driven from below, represents another potential source of upper-atmospheric heating, though initial calculations have proven inconclusive for Jupiter, largely owing to a lack of observational constraints on wave parameters. Here we report that the upper atmosphere above Jupiter's Great Red Spot-the largest storm in the Solar System-is hundreds of degrees hotter than anywhere else on the planet. This hotspot, by process of elimination, must be heated from below, and this detection is therefore strong evidence for coupling between Jupiter's lower and upper atmospheres, probably the result of upwardly propagating acoustic or gravity waves.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 120 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 28%
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 17 37%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 17%
Chemistry 4 9%
Computer Science 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1262. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#10,814
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#1,101
of 98,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142
of 380,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#18
of 953 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 953 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.