↓ Skip to main content

Simulating earthquakes with laboratory experiments

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
48 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Simulating earthquakes with laboratory experiments
Published in
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, February 2021
DOI 10.1038/s43017-021-00151-1
Authors

Louisa Brotherson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2021.
All research outputs
#872,368
of 19,577,414 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
#79
of 224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,212
of 451,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
#11
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,577,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 58.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.