| Title |
Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Climate Change, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nclimate2870 |
| Authors |
Pete Smith, Steven J. Davis, Felix Creutzig, Sabine Fuss, Jan Minx, Benoit Gabrielle, Etsushi Kato, Robert B. Jackson, Annette Cowie, Elmar Kriegler, Detlef P. van Vuuren, Joeri Rogelj, Philippe Ciais, Jennifer Milne, Josep G. Canadell, David McCollum, Glen Peters, Robbie Andrew, Volker Krey, Gyami Shrestha, Pierre Friedlingstein, Thomas Gasser, Arnulf Grübler, Wolfgang K. Heidug, Matthias Jonas, Chris D. Jones, Florian Kraxner, Emma Littleton, Jason Lowe, José Roberto Moreira, Nebojsa Nakicenovic, Michael Obersteiner, Anand Patwardhan, Mathis Rogner, Ed Rubin, Ayyoob Sharifi, Asbjørn Torvanger, Yoshiki Yamagata, Jae Edmonds, Cho Yongsung |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 289 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 53 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 40 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 12 | 4% |
| Norway | 9 | 3% |
| Australia | 8 | 3% |
| Germany | 8 | 3% |
| Sweden | 6 | 2% |
| Ireland | 5 | 2% |
| Belgium | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 33 | 11% |
| Unknown | 111 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 199 | 69% |
| Scientists | 77 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,833 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Sweden | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1801 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 314 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 272 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 258 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 146 | 8% |
| Professor | 79 | 4% |
| Other | 279 | 15% |
| Unknown | 485 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 341 | 19% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 170 | 9% |
| Engineering | 120 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 113 | 6% |
| Energy | 97 | 5% |
| Other | 371 | 20% |
| Unknown | 621 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 725. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#28,334
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Nature Climate Change
#151
of 4,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291
of 397,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Climate Change
#4
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 131.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.