↓ Skip to main content

Bees prefer foods containing neonicotinoid pesticides

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
343 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
968 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Bees prefer foods containing neonicotinoid pesticides
Published in
Nature, April 2015
DOI 10.1038/nature14414
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sébastien C. Kessler, Erin Jo Tiedeken, Kerry L. Simcock, Sophie Derveau, Jessica Mitchell, Samantha Softley, Amy Radcliffe, Jane C. Stout, Geraldine A. Wright

Abstract

The impact of neonicotinoid insecticides on insect pollinators is highly controversial. Sublethal concentrations alter the behaviour of social bees and reduce survival of entire colonies. However, critics argue that the reported negative effects only arise from neonicotinoid concentrations that are greater than those found in the nectar and pollen of pesticide-treated plants. Furthermore, it has been suggested that bees could choose to forage on other available flowers and hence avoid or dilute exposure. Here, using a two-choice feeding assay, we show that the honeybee, Apis mellifera, and the buff-tailed bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, do not avoid nectar-relevant concentrations of three of the most commonly used neonicotinoids, imidacloprid (IMD), thiamethoxam (TMX), and clothianidin (CLO), in food. Moreover, bees of both species prefer to eat more of sucrose solutions laced with IMD or TMX than sucrose alone. Stimulation with IMD, TMX and CLO neither elicited spiking responses from gustatory neurons in the bees' mouthparts, nor inhibited the responses of sucrose-sensitive neurons. Our data indicate that bees cannot taste neonicotinoids and are not repelled by them. Instead, bees preferred solutions containing IMD or TMX, even though the consumption of these pesticides caused them to eat less food overall. This work shows that bees cannot control their exposure to neonicotinoids in food and implies that treating flowering crops with IMD and TMX presents a sizeable hazard to foraging bees.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 253 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 968 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 940 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 197 20%
Student > Bachelor 154 16%
Researcher 149 15%
Student > Master 133 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 49 5%
Other 159 16%
Unknown 127 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 479 49%
Environmental Science 122 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 5%
Chemistry 36 4%
Neuroscience 18 2%
Other 91 9%
Unknown 170 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 695. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#30,404
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#2,796
of 99,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255
of 283,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#46
of 1,003 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,003 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.